7 groups
Category coverage
Laboratory systems, industrial RO, membranes, membrane filtration, cartridge filters, ion exchange and RO components.
Industrial RO, laboratory water systems, membranes, cartridge filters, ion exchange and RO components — specified against your feed water analysis and supplied across Delhi NCR and pan-India.
Water purification systems remove dissolved salts, organics, particulates and micro-organisms from a feed water so it meets a defined output specification. Selection is driven by the feed water analysis — source, TDS and fouling load — together with the required output quality and capacity. Reverse osmosis, ion exchange and membrane filtration are combined in stages to reach that specification.
Almost every specification error in this category traces back to the same thing: a system chosen from an output number without a feed water analysis behind it. Two plants asked to produce 5 m³/h of demineralised water need entirely different trains if one is fed municipal supply at 300 ppm TDS and the other a borewell at 4,000 ppm with 40 mg/L of silica.
The pages below are organised the way the decision is actually made — first the process, then the element or media, then the components that carry it. If you already know what you need, go straight to the group; if you do not, the selector works from the five variables a quotation depends on.
7 groups
Category coverage
Laboratory systems, industrial RO, membranes, membrane filtration, cartridge filters, ion exchange and RO components.
5 variables
What a quote needs
End use, feed source, feed TDS, required output quality and required capacity.
Pan-India
Supply coverage
Delhi NCR base, despatch across India including plant and project sites.
Five questions — end use, feed source, feed TDS, output quality and capacity. The answer is a configuration, not a price, and it carries straight into the enquiry form below.
End use sets the output specification more than any other single answer.
Selection guidance is indicative. Final product selection should be confirmed against your feed-water analysis, and recovery and rejection figures against the datasheet of the item quoted.
Seven groups, ordered the way a system is built up — from the finished plant down to the elements, media and components inside it.
Type I, II and III systems for analytical, QC, diagnostic and research laboratories.
Up to 18.2 MΩ·cm · point-of-use and central units
Skid-mounted brackish-water and seawater plants for borewell, municipal, seawater and treated-effluent feed.
Feed 500–45,000 ppm TDS · capacity to project scope
Spiral-wound elements — brackish water, seawater, fouling-resistant and low-energy types.
2540 / 4040 / 8040 · 96–99.8 % NaCl rejection
UF, NF, MF and MBR modules for clarification, RO pre-treatment and effluent recycle.
0.01–10 µm · roughly 200–150,000 Da MWCO
PP spun, pleated, melt-blown, activated carbon and PES / PTFE / PVDF membrane cartridges.
0.2–100 µm · 10", 20", 30" and 40" lengths
DM plants, DI systems, mixed bed units, EDI modules and ion exchange resins.
DM below 1 µS/cm · EDI up to 17 MΩ·cm
Pressure vessels, filter housings, dosing and high-pressure pumps, instruments, seals and valves.
2.5"–8" elements · FRP vessels 300–1,200 psi ratings
Groups shown with an on-page link are covered in full further down this page and quoted through the same RFQ. Groups with their own page link straight to it.
The five processes are not alternatives to one another so much as stages that sit in sequence. The comparison below is the one that decides which of them your feed water actually needs.
| Process | Nominal separation | Removes | Does not remove | Typical operating pressure | Choose it when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microfiltration (MF) | 0.1–10 µm | Suspended solids, turbidity, most bacteria and protozoan cysts | Dissolved salts, dissolved organics, viruses | 0.1–2 bar | The feed carries visible solids and the next stage needs protecting. |
| Ultrafiltration (UF) | 0.01–0.1 µm (roughly 20,000–150,000 Da) | Colloids, silt, bacteria, most viruses, macromolecules | Dissolved salts, low molecular weight organics | 1–5 bar | SDI has to come down before an RO stage, or recycle water needs clarifying without desalting it. |
| Nanofiltration (NF) | Roughly 200–1,000 Da | Divalent ions — Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, SO₄²⁻ — typically 90–98 %, plus colour and larger organics | Most monovalent salts; 20–80 % of NaCl passes | 5–15 bar | Hardness, colour or COD must drop but full desalination is not wanted — or is not wanted in the product water. |
| Reverse osmosis (RO) | Dense film, below 0.001 µm | Monovalent and divalent salts at 96–99.8 % rejection, most organics above about 100 Da, silica | Dissolved gases including CO₂, and some low molecular weight neutral organics | Brackish 10–17 bar · seawater 55–70 bar | TDS must come down by one to two orders of magnitude. |
| Ion exchange (DM / mixed bed) | Ionic — no size cut-off | Ionic species, to below 1 µS/cm from a suitable feed | Non-ionic organics, particulates, colloids, micro-organisms | 2–4 bar | Feed TDS is already low and the output has to be demineralised. |
| Electrodeionisation (EDI) | Ionic — continuous, electrically regenerated | Residual ions after RO, reaching 1–17 MΩ·cm | Particulates, organics and hardness — all of which must be removed upstream or the stack suffers | 2–6 bar | High-purity water is needed continuously and regeneration chemicals are to be designed out. |
0.1–10 µm
0.01–0.1 µm (roughly 20,000–150,000 Da)
Roughly 200–1,000 Da
Dense film, below 0.001 µm
Ionic — no size cut-off
Ionic — continuous, electrically regenerated
The trade-offs worth stating plainly
RO buys rejection with pressure, reject water and membrane replacement. At low feed TDS a softener plus ion exchange is often cheaper to run than RO plus EDI — RO earns its place as TDS rises, not automatically.
Ion exchange buys a very low outlet conductivity with regeneration chemicals, handling and effluent. EDI removes the chemicals but adds a stack that is unforgiving about hardness and organics in its feed.
NF looks like cheap RO on a datasheet and is not. If a monovalent salt is your problem, NF will pass most of it.
UF and MF do not touch dissolved salts. They are pre-treatment and clarification, and they are frequently sold as though they were desalination.
Reagent-water grades are defined by ASTM D1193 and ISO 3696; drinking water in India by IS 10500:2012; pharmacopoeial water by USP and clinical laboratory water by CLSI CLRW. Writing the standard and the parameter into the enquiry removes most of the back-and-forth from a quotation.
| ASTM D1193 grade | Resistivity, min (MΩ·cm at 25 °C) | Conductivity, max (µS/cm at 25 °C) | TOC, max (µg/L) | Sodium / chloride, max (µg/L) | Total silica, max (µg/L) | Typical production route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | 18 | 0.056 | 50 | 1 / 1 | 3 | RO followed by EDI or DI and a polishing pack, with UV where TOC is critical |
| Type II | 1.0 | 1.0 | 50 | 5 / 5 | 3 | RO followed by DI, or distillation |
| Type III | 4.0 | 0.25 | 200 | 10 / 10 | 500 | RO, or RO followed by DI |
| Type IV | 0.2 | 5.0 | No limit specified | 50 / 50 | No limit specified | Single-pass RO, or softened and deionised feed |
RO followed by EDI or DI and a polishing pack, with UV where TOC is critical
RO followed by DI, or distillation
RO, or RO followed by DI
Single-pass RO, or softened and deionised feed
Read the ASTM table before writing “Type II or better” on a purchase order
The four types are not a single descending purity scale. Type III carries a tighter conductivity limit — 0.25 µS/cm — than Type II at 1.0 µS/cm, while Type II carries the tighter TOC and ionic limits. So “Type II or better” is genuinely ambiguous as a written instruction, and two suppliers can both meet it while quoting different systems.
Name the type and then name the parameters that actually matter for the method: resistivity, TOC, and where relevant sodium, chloride and silica. Resistivity alone will not tell you whether an HPLC baseline will be clean.
TOC limits differ between editions of D1193 — the Type I figure appears as 50 µg/L in some editions and 100 µg/L in others. Confirm against the edition your SOP cites rather than against a table found online, including this one.
Water for analytical laboratory use, in three grades. Conductivity is specified at 25 °C, and the grade 3 limit is 0.5 mS/m. Limits for oxidisable matter and residue after evaporation are not specified for grade 1, and pH limits are not specified for grades 1 and 2 — high-purity water is difficult to measure meaningfully for pH.
Indian drinking water specification. Every parameter carries two figures: an acceptable limit and a permissible limit in the absence of an alternate source. TDS is 500 mg/L acceptable and 2,000 mg/L permissible; total hardness is 200 mg/L acceptable and 600 mg/L permissible, as CaCO₃. Design to the acceptable limit — the permissible figure is a tolerance, not a target.
Conductivity is assessed against a temperature-dependent stage-1 table rather than a single number, with TOC and microbial limits alongside. Quote the stage and temperature you are testing at, not a bare µS/cm figure.
Clinical laboratory reagent water, used where analyser manufacturers specify it. It sets resistivity, TOC, particulate and microbial requirements together, so a system meeting resistivity alone does not meet CLRW.
The eight faults below account for most of the water-treatment enquiries that arrive as “the plant is not performing”. Work the check column before ordering anything — several of these are settings or consumables rather than a system problem.
| Symptom | Likely cause | What to check | Product path |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO permeate TDS rising, product quality drifting | Membrane fouling or scaling, a failed brine seal or O-ring, or a genuine rise in feed TDS | Normalised salt passage and permeate flow against commissioning data; current feed TDS; probe individual vessels to find the affected element | CIP chemicals, replacement elements, brine seals |
| Feed pressure climbing at constant permeate flow | Biofouling or colloidal fouling on the lead elements | Differential pressure stage by stage; SDI₁₅ on the RO feed; how often the cartridge filters are being changed | UF pre-treatment or a finer cartridge stage, plus CIP |
| Permeate flow falling while pressure stays steady | Scaling on the tail elements — calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate or silica | Saturation indices from the feed analysis at the design recovery; actual recovery; antiscalant dose rate and pump stroke | Antiscalant dosing review, acid CIP, dosing pump service |
| DI or mixed-bed outlet conductivity breaking through earlier each cycle | Resin exhaustion, fouling or bed loss — or a higher ionic load arriving from a failing RO upstream | RO permeate conductivity feeding the unit; throughput since the last regeneration; bed depth and resin condition | Resin replacement, mixed bed, or EDI to remove the regeneration cycle entirely |
| Type I system will not hold 18.2 MΩ·cm | Exhausted polishing pack, CO₂ ingress through the vent, or recirculation not running | Hours and volume on the polishing pack; whether recirculation is continuous; conductivity of the feed stage | Polishing packs, vent filter, feed-stage service |
| HPLC baseline drift or ghost peaks, with resistivity reading fine | Organic carryover — resistivity does not measure TOC, so a clean resistivity reading proves nothing about organics | TOC reading, UV lamp hours, and the age of the final filter | UV oxidation module, low-TOC configuration, 0.22 µm final filter |
| Cartridge filters blocking within days | High turbidity or dissolved iron in borewell feed, or a micron rating chosen too fine for the load | Feed turbidity in NTU, iron in mg/L, SDI; the current micron rating and cartridge length | Multi-grade and iron removal ahead of the cartridges, then a staged 25 → 5 → 1 µm arrangement |
| Recovery below design and reject volume high | The scaling limit has been reached, or recovery was set conservatively for the feed analysis | Feed hardness, silica and sulphate; concentrate saturation at the design recovery | Antiscalant selection, or a concentrate-stage and second-pass design review |
Indicative diagnostics for a first pass, not a substitute for plant data. Where a system is under warranty or an AMC, check the terms before any CIP or element change.
Feed TDS sets the process train, the element type and the recovery you can design for. The bands below are the ones plants are actually built around; the notes are where the specification usually goes wrong.
| Feed TDS band | Typical source | Indicated process train | Element type | Typical recovery | What decides it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Below 500 ppm | Municipal supply | Cartridge filtration → RO, or softener → RO | Low-energy brackish-water element | 70–80 % | Free chlorine must be removed by carbon or SMBS ahead of a polyamide membrane — chlorine damage is not recoverable by cleaning. |
| 500–2,000 ppm | Treated municipal or shallow borewell | Multi-grade and carbon → cartridge → brackish-water RO | Standard brackish-water element | 65–75 % | Check hardness and silica before fixing recovery; both bite well before TDS does. |
| 2,000–10,000 ppm | Borewell or brackish groundwater | Pre-treatment → brackish-water RO, frequently two-stage | Brackish-water element | 55–70 % | Antiscalant is selected from the concentrate saturation at design recovery, not from the feed analysis alone. |
| 10,000–25,000 ppm | High-salinity brackish or blended feed | High-pressure brackish RO, or seawater elements at reduced pressure | High-rejection brackish or seawater element | 40–55 % | Pump duty and pressure-vessel rating have to be confirmed at this band — a 300 psi vessel does not belong here. |
| 25,000–45,000 ppm | Seawater | Seawater RO with a dedicated high-pressure pump | Seawater element | 35–45 % | Needs 55–70 bar. Material selection on the high-pressure side matters as much as the membrane choice. |
| Variable — treated effluent | STP or ETP recycle | MBR or UF → cartridge → fouling-resistant RO | Fouling-resistant element | 50–70 % | Specify against the effluent analysis and its variability, never against a single TDS number. |
Municipal supply
Treated municipal or shallow borewell
Borewell or brackish groundwater
High-salinity brackish or blended feed
Seawater
STP or ETP recycle
Recovery figures are typical design bands, not guarantees. Final recovery is confirmed against your feed water analysis and the element datasheet before a system is offered.
The same output specification is reached differently depending on what the water is for. These are the configurations these industries usually end up with.
None of the following is a guarantee of performance; all of it is what plants that stay in specification tend to have in common.
Intervals below are indicative planning figures. The right column is what should actually trigger the change — every one of these items fails on duty, not on the calendar.
| Item | Typical interval | What really decides it | Signs it is due |
|---|---|---|---|
| PP spun and melt-blown cartridges | 4–12 weeks | Feed turbidity and iron load | Differential pressure across the housing rises by roughly 1 bar, or feed pressure climbs at constant flow |
| Activated carbon cartridges | 3–6 months | Chlorine load and throughput | Free chlorine detected downstream — that test, not the calendar, is the decision |
| Pleated and membrane cartridges (0.22 / 0.45 µm) | Per batch or per validated cycle | Integrity test result and the validated use period | A failed integrity test, or the end of the validated period, whichever comes first |
| Antiscalant | Continuous dosing | Dose rate against concentrate saturation | Tank drawdown not matching the stroke setting; scale appearing on tail elements |
| RO membrane elements — brackish feed | 3–5 years | Normalised salt passage and flow, not age | Normalised salt passage up 10–15 %, or normalised flow down 10–15 %, against commissioning data |
| RO membrane elements — treated effluent feed | 2–3 years | Fouling rate and CIP frequency | Cleaning needed progressively more often, with recovery falling between cleans |
| DI and mixed-bed resin | By throughput, not by date | Ionic load — feed conductivity multiplied by volume treated | Outlet conductivity breaking through earlier on each successive cycle |
| UV lamps (254 nm and 185 nm) | Around 9,000 hours, roughly 12 months continuous | Rated lamp hours | Hour meter at rated life — UV output falls well before a lamp stops lighting, so a lit lamp is not a working one |
| Laboratory polishing packs | 6–12 months | Volume dispensed and feed quality | Resistivity will no longer hold at 18.2 MΩ·cm |
4–12 weeks
3–6 months
Per batch or per validated cycle
Continuous dosing
3–5 years
2–3 years
By throughput, not by date
Around 9,000 hours, roughly 12 months continuous
6–12 months
Intervals are typical planning bands and vary with feed water, duty and the specific product supplied. Final intervals follow the datasheet of the item quoted.
Cartridges, antiscalant, resin, UV lamps and polishing packs are predictable once the plant has run a full year. Sending the plant list and last year's consumption gets them scheduled against your maintenance calendar instead of ordered in an emergency at the point the plant is already out of specification.
Water treatment does not have a list price, and any supplier quoting one before seeing a feed analysis is quoting a different plant from the one you need.
On request, and capacity-dependent. Plant pricing moves with capacity, feed water analysis and the recovery target; membranes, cartridges and resins are quoted per element, per lot or per litre of media.
From a single replacement element or a case of cartridges through to full plant scope. Consumable lines are quoted per box or per lot, and the lot size is stated on the quotation.
Confirmed per line item at quotation stage. Stocked consumable lines and made-to-order plant differ substantially, so a single blanket lead time for the category would be misleading — the quotation carries the figure for each line.
GST invoice against company or institutional purchase order. Proforma issued where advance payment or internal approval requires it.
Despatch from Delhi NCR across India, including plant, project and institutional sites. Delivery city and site access are asked for at enquiry because both affect despatch mode.
Technical datasheet for the item quoted, and a test certificate where the principal supplies one with that product. Tender and institutional documentation formats are prepared on request — send the format with the enquiry so the quotation is issued in a form you can submit without rework.
ScientificEdge helps laboratories structure product, grade and documentation requirements for instruments, chemicals, filtration systems and consumables before supply is confirmed.
Authentic Supply
Product identity and requested make reviewed against the exact sourcing requirement.
Documentation Support
Clear technical specs, compliance details, and buying clarity.
PAN-India Delivery
Timely fulfilment with responsive coordination across regions.
Partner Confidence
Brand-focused sourcing support
For pharma, research, diagnostics and industrial laboratories that need clear product and documentation discussions.
Featured Brand Portfolio
30 local brand logos
ScientificEdge is a B2B supplier, wholesaler, distributor and sourcing partner. We are not a manufacturer, OEM or fabricator of water purification equipment, and we are not a testing or certification laboratory.
Where a brand or an equivalent element is specified in your BOQ, tell us at enquiry and we quote against it. Where no brand is specified, we usually offer more than one option so the technical and commercial comparison sits with you rather than being made for you.
Membranes, cartridges and resins are frequently specified as an equivalent to a named element. Send the model designation you are replacing along with the operating conditions, and the offered equivalent is matched on active area, rejection and pressure rating rather than on the part number alone.
A water treatment requirement is rarely one line item. Splitting it across a plant vendor, a membrane trader and a consumables supplier is where lead times and compatibility problems come from.
Plant, elements, filters, media and components quoted together, so vessel bore, element size and seal kits are matched at quotation stage rather than discovered at installation.
Feed water analysis, output specification and capacity drive the recommendation. Where the analysis is incomplete, we tell you which parameter is missing rather than assuming a value.
Recurring items are scheduled against your maintenance calendar once a plant has a year of running behind it.
GST invoicing, purchase order and proforma handling, and tender or institutional documentation formats prepared to the format your process requires.
Required fields first; the technical section expands when you need it. Completing the technical fields is usually the difference between a quotation on the first pass and three emails of clarification.
They separate at different scales. MF removes particles from 0.1 to 10 µm, UF removes colloids and bacteria from 0.01 to 0.1 µm, NF rejects divalent ions at roughly 200 to 1,000 Da, and RO rejects monovalent and divalent salts at 96 to 99.8 %.
Only NF and RO reduce dissolved salts. UF and MF are pre-treatment and clarification — they will not lower TDS.
The three common causes are membrane fouling or scaling, a failed brine seal or O-ring allowing feed to bypass the element, and a genuine rise in feed TDS.
Separate them by normalising permeate flow and salt passage against commissioning data, checking current feed TDS, and probing individual vessels. Rising salt passage with steady flow points at a seal or element failure; falling flow points at fouling or scaling.
Fouling comes from biological growth, colloids and organics arriving from the feed; scaling comes from sparingly soluble salts concentrating in the reject — calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate and silica.
The pattern differs. Fouling typically shows first as rising differential pressure across the lead elements. Scaling typically shows as falling permeate flow with rising salt passage on the tail elements. Where each appears in the array is the most reliable clue.
By plant flow. An 8040 element carries roughly four times the active area of a 4040 of the same length, so 8040 suits higher-flow plants with fewer vessels, while 4040 suits smaller skids, tighter plant rooms and staged expansion.
Whichever you choose, vessel bore, adapters and brine seals must match the element size exactly. Mixing sizes within an array is not a substitution you can make on site.
Brackish-water elements are normally applied up to around 10,000 ppm feed TDS, at 55 to 75 % recovery depending on hardness and silica. Between 10,000 and 25,000 ppm the design moves to high-pressure brackish or seawater elements; above 25,000 ppm it is seawater RO at 55 to 70 bar.
Recovery is limited by scaling, not by TDS alone. Silica and hardness frequently cap recovery well before the salinity does.
A DM plant uses ion exchange resin regenerated with acid and caustic on a batch cycle. EDI regenerates continuously using an electric field, so it produces high-purity water without regeneration chemicals or a regeneration outage.
EDI is less tolerant of its feed. Hardness, chlorine and organics must be removed upstream, which in practice means EDI is fed by RO permeate rather than raw water.
Type I is the highest purity — 18 MΩ·cm minimum resistivity, 1 µg/L sodium and chloride — for HPLC, LC-MS, PCR and trace analysis. Type II at 1.0 MΩ·cm suits general analytical work. Type III at 4.0 MΩ·cm suits glasswash, autoclave feed and reagent make-up.
Note that Type III has a tighter conductivity limit than Type II. The types are not one descending scale, so name the parameters that matter, not just the type.
Borewell feed between 2,000 and 10,000 ppm TDS usually needs pre-treatment followed by brackish-water RO, often in two stages, at 55 to 70 % recovery.
The pre-treatment is decided by what else is in the water. Iron, hardness, silica and turbidity each call for a different upstream stage, and getting that wrong is what blocks cartridge filters within days and fouls elements within months.
Typically 3 to 5 years on brackish feed and 2 to 3 years on treated effluent, but age is the weakest indicator. Replace on trend: normalised salt passage up 10 to 15 %, or normalised permeate flow down 10 to 15 % against commissioning data, and not recovering after a clean.
This is why commissioning data matters. Without it there is no baseline to normalise against and replacement becomes guesswork.
PP spun and melt-blown cartridges typically run 4 to 12 weeks, activated carbon 3 to 6 months, and UV lamps around 9,000 hours or roughly 12 months of continuous operation.
Use the duty signal rather than the date. Change cartridges when differential pressure across the housing rises by about 1 bar, change carbon when free chlorine is detected downstream, and change UV lamps at rated hours — output falls long before a lamp stops lighting.
Five things decide the design: end use, feed water source, feed TDS in ppm or conductivity in µS/cm, required output quality, and required capacity in LPH or m³/h.
A feed water analysis is worth more than all five described in prose. If you have a lab report, send it — it removes the largest single source of quotation error in this category.
Yes. Despatch is from Delhi NCR across India, covering plant, project, institutional and laboratory sites, and we support bulk orders, tenders and rate contracts.
For tender work, send the documentation format your procurement process requires along with the technical scope. Lead time is confirmed per line item on the quotation, because stocked consumables and made-to-order plant differ substantially.
Categories commonly specified alongside water purification systems.
Connect with ScientificEdge for dependable product selection, transparent quotations, and quick support across laboratory equipment, chemicals, filtration, and ultrapure water workflows.
Why Teams Choose Us
Certified Product Range
Equipment, chemicals, filtration, and water systems from trusted brands.
Technical Buying Support
Practical recommendations based on workflow, compliance, and budget.
Fast PAN-India Dispatch
Coordinated fulfilment with clear updates and responsive communication.