Water purification systems — sourcing & supply

Water Purification Systems Supplier in India

Skid-mounted industrial reverse osmosis plant with pressure vessels, cartridge pre-filters and a control panelAn industrial reverse osmosis system on a steel skid: three horizontal fibreglass pressure vessels holding spiral-wound RO membrane elements, two cartridge filter housings for pre-filtration, a multistage high-pressure pump, an antiscalant dosing pump with its chemical tank, inter-stage pressure gauges, and a control panel displaying feed TDS, permeate TDS and applied pressure.FEED TDS3210 ppmPERMEATE41 ppm43 ppmBAR14.2REC %68
Feed TDS: 500–45,000 ppmOutput: to 18.2 MΩ·cmSupply: Pan-India

Industrial RO, laboratory water systems, membranes, cartridge filters, ion exchange and RO components — specified against your feed water analysis and supplied across Delhi NCR and pan-India.

  • Seven product groups from a single sourcing desk — plant, membranes, filters, resins and components
  • Selection worked against your feed water analysis, output specification and capacity
  • Delhi NCR base with pan-India supply, including plant sites
Answer first

What a Water Purification System Does, and What Decides the Specification

Water purification systems remove dissolved salts, organics, particulates and micro-organisms from a feed water so it meets a defined output specification. Selection is driven by the feed water analysis — source, TDS and fouling load — together with the required output quality and capacity. Reverse osmosis, ion exchange and membrane filtration are combined in stages to reach that specification.

Almost every specification error in this category traces back to the same thing: a system chosen from an output number without a feed water analysis behind it. Two plants asked to produce 5 m³/h of demineralised water need entirely different trains if one is fed municipal supply at 300 ppm TDS and the other a borewell at 4,000 ppm with 40 mg/L of silica.

The pages below are organised the way the decision is actually made — first the process, then the element or media, then the components that carry it. If you already know what you need, go straight to the group; if you do not, the selector works from the five variables a quotation depends on.

7 groups

Category coverage

Laboratory systems, industrial RO, membranes, membrane filtration, cartridge filters, ion exchange and RO components.

5 variables

What a quote needs

End use, feed source, feed TDS, required output quality and required capacity.

Pan-India

Supply coverage

Delhi NCR base, despatch across India including plant and project sites.

Find the right system

Find the Right Water Purification System

Five questions — end use, feed source, feed TDS, output quality and capacity. The answer is a configuration, not a price, and it carries straight into the enquiry form below.

Step 1 of 5

What is the water for?

End use sets the output specification more than any other single answer.

Selection guidance is indicative. Final product selection should be confirmed against your feed-water analysis, and recovery and rejection figures against the datasheet of the item quoted.

Category structure

Water Purification Product Groups

Seven groups, ordered the way a system is built up — from the finished plant down to the elements, media and components inside it.

Groups shown with an on-page link are covered in full further down this page and quoted through the same RFQ. Groups with their own page link straight to it.

Solution aware

RO vs NF vs UF vs MF vs Ion Exchange — What Each Process Actually Removes

The five processes are not alternatives to one another so much as stages that sit in sequence. The comparison below is the one that decides which of them your feed water actually needs.

Separation range, removal capability, operating pressure and selection trigger for each water treatment process.
ProcessNominal separationRemovesDoes not removeTypical operating pressureChoose it when
Microfiltration (MF)0.1–10 µmSuspended solids, turbidity, most bacteria and protozoan cystsDissolved salts, dissolved organics, viruses0.1–2 barThe feed carries visible solids and the next stage needs protecting.
Ultrafiltration (UF)0.01–0.1 µm (roughly 20,000–150,000 Da)Colloids, silt, bacteria, most viruses, macromoleculesDissolved salts, low molecular weight organics1–5 barSDI has to come down before an RO stage, or recycle water needs clarifying without desalting it.
Nanofiltration (NF)Roughly 200–1,000 DaDivalent ions — Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, SO₄²⁻ — typically 90–98 %, plus colour and larger organicsMost monovalent salts; 20–80 % of NaCl passes5–15 barHardness, colour or COD must drop but full desalination is not wanted — or is not wanted in the product water.
Reverse osmosis (RO)Dense film, below 0.001 µmMonovalent and divalent salts at 96–99.8 % rejection, most organics above about 100 Da, silicaDissolved gases including CO₂, and some low molecular weight neutral organicsBrackish 10–17 bar · seawater 55–70 barTDS must come down by one to two orders of magnitude.
Ion exchange (DM / mixed bed)Ionic — no size cut-offIonic species, to below 1 µS/cm from a suitable feedNon-ionic organics, particulates, colloids, micro-organisms2–4 barFeed TDS is already low and the output has to be demineralised.
Electrodeionisation (EDI)Ionic — continuous, electrically regeneratedResidual ions after RO, reaching 1–17 MΩ·cmParticulates, organics and hardness — all of which must be removed upstream or the stack suffers2–6 barHigh-purity water is needed continuously and regeneration chemicals are to be designed out.

Microfiltration (MF)

0.1–10 µm

Removes
Suspended solids, turbidity, most bacteria and protozoan cysts
Does not remove
Dissolved salts, dissolved organics, viruses
Typical operating pressure
0.1–2 bar
Choose it when
The feed carries visible solids and the next stage needs protecting.

Ultrafiltration (UF)

0.01–0.1 µm (roughly 20,000–150,000 Da)

Removes
Colloids, silt, bacteria, most viruses, macromolecules
Does not remove
Dissolved salts, low molecular weight organics
Typical operating pressure
1–5 bar
Choose it when
SDI has to come down before an RO stage, or recycle water needs clarifying without desalting it.

Nanofiltration (NF)

Roughly 200–1,000 Da

Removes
Divalent ions — Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, SO₄²⁻ — typically 90–98 %, plus colour and larger organics
Does not remove
Most monovalent salts; 20–80 % of NaCl passes
Typical operating pressure
5–15 bar
Choose it when
Hardness, colour or COD must drop but full desalination is not wanted — or is not wanted in the product water.

Reverse osmosis (RO)

Dense film, below 0.001 µm

Removes
Monovalent and divalent salts at 96–99.8 % rejection, most organics above about 100 Da, silica
Does not remove
Dissolved gases including CO₂, and some low molecular weight neutral organics
Typical operating pressure
Brackish 10–17 bar · seawater 55–70 bar
Choose it when
TDS must come down by one to two orders of magnitude.

Ion exchange (DM / mixed bed)

Ionic — no size cut-off

Removes
Ionic species, to below 1 µS/cm from a suitable feed
Does not remove
Non-ionic organics, particulates, colloids, micro-organisms
Typical operating pressure
2–4 bar
Choose it when
Feed TDS is already low and the output has to be demineralised.

Electrodeionisation (EDI)

Ionic — continuous, electrically regenerated

Removes
Residual ions after RO, reaching 1–17 MΩ·cm
Does not remove
Particulates, organics and hardness — all of which must be removed upstream or the stack suffers
Typical operating pressure
2–6 bar
Choose it when
High-purity water is needed continuously and regeneration chemicals are to be designed out.

The trade-offs worth stating plainly

RO buys rejection with pressure, reject water and membrane replacement. At low feed TDS a softener plus ion exchange is often cheaper to run than RO plus EDI — RO earns its place as TDS rises, not automatically.

Ion exchange buys a very low outlet conductivity with regeneration chemicals, handling and effluent. EDI removes the chemicals but adds a stack that is unforgiving about hardness and organics in its feed.

NF looks like cheap RO on a datasheet and is not. If a monovalent salt is your problem, NF will pass most of it.

UF and MF do not touch dissolved salts. They are pre-treatment and clarification, and they are frequently sold as though they were desalination.

Specification reference

Water Quality Grades and the Standards That Define Them

Reagent-water grades are defined by ASTM D1193 and ISO 3696; drinking water in India by IS 10500:2012; pharmacopoeial water by USP and clinical laboratory water by CLSI CLRW. Writing the standard and the parameter into the enquiry removes most of the back-and-forth from a quotation.

ASTM D1193 reagent water grades — limit values at 25 °C.
ASTM D1193 gradeResistivity, min (MΩ·cm at 25 °C)Conductivity, max (µS/cm at 25 °C)TOC, max (µg/L)Sodium / chloride, max (µg/L)Total silica, max (µg/L)Typical production route
Type I180.056501 / 13RO followed by EDI or DI and a polishing pack, with UV where TOC is critical
Type II1.01.0505 / 53RO followed by DI, or distillation
Type III4.00.2520010 / 10500RO, or RO followed by DI
Type IV0.25.0No limit specified50 / 50No limit specifiedSingle-pass RO, or softened and deionised feed

ASTM D1193 Type I

RO followed by EDI or DI and a polishing pack, with UV where TOC is critical

Resistivity, min
18 MΩ·cm at 25 °C
Conductivity, max
0.056 µS/cm at 25 °C
TOC, max
50 µg/L
Sodium / chloride, max
1 / 1 µg/L
Total silica, max
3 µg/L

ASTM D1193 Type II

RO followed by DI, or distillation

Resistivity, min
1.0 MΩ·cm at 25 °C
Conductivity, max
1.0 µS/cm at 25 °C
TOC, max
50 µg/L
Sodium / chloride, max
5 / 5 µg/L
Total silica, max
3 µg/L

ASTM D1193 Type III

RO, or RO followed by DI

Resistivity, min
4.0 MΩ·cm at 25 °C
Conductivity, max
0.25 µS/cm at 25 °C
TOC, max
200 µg/L
Sodium / chloride, max
10 / 10 µg/L
Total silica, max
500 µg/L

ASTM D1193 Type IV

Single-pass RO, or softened and deionised feed

Resistivity, min
0.2 MΩ·cm at 25 °C
Conductivity, max
5.0 µS/cm at 25 °C
TOC, max
No limit specified
Sodium / chloride, max
50 / 50 µg/L
Total silica, max
No limit specified

Read the ASTM table before writing “Type II or better” on a purchase order

The four types are not a single descending purity scale. Type III carries a tighter conductivity limit — 0.25 µS/cm — than Type II at 1.0 µS/cm, while Type II carries the tighter TOC and ionic limits. So “Type II or better” is genuinely ambiguous as a written instruction, and two suppliers can both meet it while quoting different systems.

Name the type and then name the parameters that actually matter for the method: resistivity, TOC, and where relevant sodium, chloride and silica. Resistivity alone will not tell you whether an HPLC baseline will be clean.

TOC limits differ between editions of D1193 — the Type I figure appears as 50 µg/L in some editions and 100 µg/L in others. Confirm against the edition your SOP cites rather than against a table found online, including this one.

The other standards that come up in this category

ISO 3696

Water for analytical laboratory use, in three grades. Conductivity is specified at 25 °C, and the grade 3 limit is 0.5 mS/m. Limits for oxidisable matter and residue after evaporation are not specified for grade 1, and pH limits are not specified for grades 1 and 2 — high-purity water is difficult to measure meaningfully for pH.

IS 10500:2012

Indian drinking water specification. Every parameter carries two figures: an acceptable limit and a permissible limit in the absence of an alternate source. TDS is 500 mg/L acceptable and 2,000 mg/L permissible; total hardness is 200 mg/L acceptable and 600 mg/L permissible, as CaCO₃. Design to the acceptable limit — the permissible figure is a tolerance, not a target.

USP purified water

Conductivity is assessed against a temperature-dependent stage-1 table rather than a single number, with TOC and microbial limits alongside. Quote the stage and temperature you are testing at, not a bare µS/cm figure.

CLSI CLRW

Clinical laboratory reagent water, used where analyser manufacturers specify it. It sets resistivity, TOC, particulate and microbial requirements together, so a system meeting resistivity alone does not meet CLRW.

Problem aware

Symptom, Likely Cause, What to Check, and Which Product Path

The eight faults below account for most of the water-treatment enquiries that arrive as “the plant is not performing”. Work the check column before ordering anything — several of these are settings or consumables rather than a system problem.

Common water treatment plant symptoms with likely cause, the check that separates the causes, and the product path each points to.
SymptomLikely causeWhat to checkProduct path
RO permeate TDS rising, product quality driftingMembrane fouling or scaling, a failed brine seal or O-ring, or a genuine rise in feed TDSNormalised salt passage and permeate flow against commissioning data; current feed TDS; probe individual vessels to find the affected elementCIP chemicals, replacement elements, brine seals
Feed pressure climbing at constant permeate flowBiofouling or colloidal fouling on the lead elementsDifferential pressure stage by stage; SDI₁₅ on the RO feed; how often the cartridge filters are being changedUF pre-treatment or a finer cartridge stage, plus CIP
Permeate flow falling while pressure stays steadyScaling on the tail elements — calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate or silicaSaturation indices from the feed analysis at the design recovery; actual recovery; antiscalant dose rate and pump strokeAntiscalant dosing review, acid CIP, dosing pump service
DI or mixed-bed outlet conductivity breaking through earlier each cycleResin exhaustion, fouling or bed loss — or a higher ionic load arriving from a failing RO upstreamRO permeate conductivity feeding the unit; throughput since the last regeneration; bed depth and resin conditionResin replacement, mixed bed, or EDI to remove the regeneration cycle entirely
Type I system will not hold 18.2 MΩ·cmExhausted polishing pack, CO₂ ingress through the vent, or recirculation not runningHours and volume on the polishing pack; whether recirculation is continuous; conductivity of the feed stagePolishing packs, vent filter, feed-stage service
HPLC baseline drift or ghost peaks, with resistivity reading fineOrganic carryover — resistivity does not measure TOC, so a clean resistivity reading proves nothing about organicsTOC reading, UV lamp hours, and the age of the final filterUV oxidation module, low-TOC configuration, 0.22 µm final filter
Cartridge filters blocking within daysHigh turbidity or dissolved iron in borewell feed, or a micron rating chosen too fine for the loadFeed turbidity in NTU, iron in mg/L, SDI; the current micron rating and cartridge lengthMulti-grade and iron removal ahead of the cartridges, then a staged 25 → 5 → 1 µm arrangement
Recovery below design and reject volume highThe scaling limit has been reached, or recovery was set conservatively for the feed analysisFeed hardness, silica and sulphate; concentrate saturation at the design recoveryAntiscalant selection, or a concentrate-stage and second-pass design review

RO permeate TDS rising, product quality drifting

Likely cause
Membrane fouling or scaling, a failed brine seal or O-ring, or a genuine rise in feed TDS
What to check
Normalised salt passage and permeate flow against commissioning data; current feed TDS; probe individual vessels to find the affected element

Feed pressure climbing at constant permeate flow

Likely cause
Biofouling or colloidal fouling on the lead elements
What to check
Differential pressure stage by stage; SDI₁₅ on the RO feed; how often the cartridge filters are being changed

Permeate flow falling while pressure stays steady

Likely cause
Scaling on the tail elements — calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate or silica
What to check
Saturation indices from the feed analysis at the design recovery; actual recovery; antiscalant dose rate and pump stroke

DI or mixed-bed outlet conductivity breaking through earlier each cycle

Likely cause
Resin exhaustion, fouling or bed loss — or a higher ionic load arriving from a failing RO upstream
What to check
RO permeate conductivity feeding the unit; throughput since the last regeneration; bed depth and resin condition

Type I system will not hold 18.2 MΩ·cm

Likely cause
Exhausted polishing pack, CO₂ ingress through the vent, or recirculation not running
What to check
Hours and volume on the polishing pack; whether recirculation is continuous; conductivity of the feed stage

HPLC baseline drift or ghost peaks, with resistivity reading fine

Likely cause
Organic carryover — resistivity does not measure TOC, so a clean resistivity reading proves nothing about organics
What to check
TOC reading, UV lamp hours, and the age of the final filter

Indicative diagnostics for a first pass, not a substitute for plant data. Where a system is under warranty or an AMC, check the terms before any CIP or element change.

Specification

Selection Matrix — Feed TDS to Process Train

Feed TDS sets the process train, the element type and the recovery you can design for. The bands below are the ones plants are actually built around; the notes are where the specification usually goes wrong.

Feed TDS band mapped to source, process train, element type and typical design recovery.
Feed TDS bandTypical sourceIndicated process trainElement typeTypical recoveryWhat decides it
Below 500 ppmMunicipal supplyCartridge filtration → RO, or softener → ROLow-energy brackish-water element70–80 %Free chlorine must be removed by carbon or SMBS ahead of a polyamide membrane — chlorine damage is not recoverable by cleaning.
500–2,000 ppmTreated municipal or shallow borewellMulti-grade and carbon → cartridge → brackish-water ROStandard brackish-water element65–75 %Check hardness and silica before fixing recovery; both bite well before TDS does.
2,000–10,000 ppmBorewell or brackish groundwaterPre-treatment → brackish-water RO, frequently two-stageBrackish-water element55–70 %Antiscalant is selected from the concentrate saturation at design recovery, not from the feed analysis alone.
10,000–25,000 ppmHigh-salinity brackish or blended feedHigh-pressure brackish RO, or seawater elements at reduced pressureHigh-rejection brackish or seawater element40–55 %Pump duty and pressure-vessel rating have to be confirmed at this band — a 300 psi vessel does not belong here.
25,000–45,000 ppmSeawaterSeawater RO with a dedicated high-pressure pumpSeawater element35–45 %Needs 55–70 bar. Material selection on the high-pressure side matters as much as the membrane choice.
Variable — treated effluentSTP or ETP recycleMBR or UF → cartridge → fouling-resistant ROFouling-resistant element50–70 %Specify against the effluent analysis and its variability, never against a single TDS number.

Below 500 ppm

Municipal supply

Indicated process train
Cartridge filtration → RO, or softener → RO
Element type
Low-energy brackish-water element
Typical recovery
70–80 %
What decides it
Free chlorine must be removed by carbon or SMBS ahead of a polyamide membrane — chlorine damage is not recoverable by cleaning.

500–2,000 ppm

Treated municipal or shallow borewell

Indicated process train
Multi-grade and carbon → cartridge → brackish-water RO
Element type
Standard brackish-water element
Typical recovery
65–75 %
What decides it
Check hardness and silica before fixing recovery; both bite well before TDS does.

2,000–10,000 ppm

Borewell or brackish groundwater

Indicated process train
Pre-treatment → brackish-water RO, frequently two-stage
Element type
Brackish-water element
Typical recovery
55–70 %
What decides it
Antiscalant is selected from the concentrate saturation at design recovery, not from the feed analysis alone.

10,000–25,000 ppm

High-salinity brackish or blended feed

Indicated process train
High-pressure brackish RO, or seawater elements at reduced pressure
Element type
High-rejection brackish or seawater element
Typical recovery
40–55 %
What decides it
Pump duty and pressure-vessel rating have to be confirmed at this band — a 300 psi vessel does not belong here.

25,000–45,000 ppm

Seawater

Indicated process train
Seawater RO with a dedicated high-pressure pump
Element type
Seawater element
Typical recovery
35–45 %
What decides it
Needs 55–70 bar. Material selection on the high-pressure side matters as much as the membrane choice.

Variable — treated effluent

STP or ETP recycle

Indicated process train
MBR or UF → cartridge → fouling-resistant RO
Element type
Fouling-resistant element
Typical recovery
50–70 %
What decides it
Specify against the effluent analysis and its variability, never against a single TDS number.

Recovery figures are typical design bands, not guarantees. Final recovery is confirmed against your feed water analysis and the element datasheet before a system is offered.

Application mapping

Applications, Typical Requirement and Indicated Configuration

The same output specification is reached differently depending on what the water is for. These are the configurations these industries usually end up with.

Pharmaceutical QC and production

Typical requirement
Purified water to a compendial conductivity limit, plus Type I at the bench
Indicated configuration
Softener → RO → EDI with a distribution loop, and a Type I polisher at point of use
Pharmaceutical laboratory equipment

Laboratory and research

Typical requirement
Type I for HPLC, LC-MS and PCR; Type III for glasswash and autoclave feed
Indicated configuration
An RO base unit with a Type I polisher, adding UV and UF where TOC and nucleases matter
Laboratory water purification systems

Food, beverage and packaged drinking water

Typical requirement
Output within IS 10500 acceptable limits with a consistent mineral profile
Indicated configuration
Multi-grade and carbon → RO with controlled blending → UV or ozone disinfection
Water testing solutions

STP, ETP and water recycling

Typical requirement
Treated effluent brought back to process or utility quality
Indicated configuration
MBR or UF → cartridge → fouling-resistant RO, with recovery set from the effluent analysis
STP and ETP solutions

Chemical, petrochemical and ethanol

Typical requirement
DM water for process make-up, often against a high silica feed
Indicated configuration
Two-stage RO → mixed bed, or a DM plant with a degasser between cation and anion
Ion exchange and high-purity water

Power generation and boiler feed

Typical requirement
Very low conductivity and silica for high-pressure boilers
Indicated configuration
RO → EDI → mixed bed polisher, with silica monitored continuously on the outlet
Water analyzers for silica and conductivity

Hospitals and diagnostics

Typical requirement
Reagent-grade water for analysers, available consistently through the working day
Indicated configuration
A Type II central unit with storage, and a Type I polisher at the analyser
Laboratory water purification systems

Educational institutions

Typical requirement
Dependable Type II or III for teaching laboratories at a controlled running cost
Indicated configuration
A compact RO/DI unit sized for peak class use, with consumables planned annually rather than reactively
Laboratory chemicals for education
Installation, operation and maintenance

Notes That Save Money After Commissioning

None of the following is a guarantee of performance; all of it is what plants that stay in specification tend to have in common.

Record commissioning data on day oneFeed TDS and temperature, applied pressure, permeate and concentrate flow, and permeate conductivity. Without that baseline, normalised performance cannot be calculated later and every subsequent fault becomes guesswork.
Instrument the plant enough to see a trendInter-stage pressure gauges and permeate/concentrate flow meters are cheap relative to a set of elements. A plant that cannot show differential pressure per stage cannot tell fouling from scaling.
Clean on trend, not on scheduleThe widely used trigger is a 10–15 % change in normalised permeate flow or salt passage against commissioning data. Cleaning earlier wears membranes for no gain; cleaning much later often does not fully recover them.
Protect the membrane from chlorine, alwaysPolyamide membranes are damaged by free chlorine and the damage is not reversible by cleaning. Carbon or SMBS dosing ahead of the RO, and a downstream free-chlorine check, are not optional on chlorinated feed.
Preserve elements that will sit idlePlants shut down for a plant holiday or a monsoon-season outage need the elements preserved rather than left wet. Biological growth in a stagnant vessel does more damage than the shutdown period suggests.
Keep the seal and gasket kit on siteBrine seals, adapter O-rings and housing gaskets cost very little and are the parts that turn a two-hour element change into a two-day one when they are not on the shelf.
Replacement and consumables

Replacement Intervals and the Signs It Is Actually Due

Intervals below are indicative planning figures. The right column is what should actually trigger the change — every one of these items fails on duty, not on the calendar.

Typical replacement intervals for water treatment consumables, with the duty signal that should actually trigger the change.
ItemTypical intervalWhat really decides itSigns it is due
PP spun and melt-blown cartridges4–12 weeksFeed turbidity and iron loadDifferential pressure across the housing rises by roughly 1 bar, or feed pressure climbs at constant flow
Activated carbon cartridges3–6 monthsChlorine load and throughputFree chlorine detected downstream — that test, not the calendar, is the decision
Pleated and membrane cartridges (0.22 / 0.45 µm)Per batch or per validated cycleIntegrity test result and the validated use periodA failed integrity test, or the end of the validated period, whichever comes first
AntiscalantContinuous dosingDose rate against concentrate saturationTank drawdown not matching the stroke setting; scale appearing on tail elements
RO membrane elements — brackish feed3–5 yearsNormalised salt passage and flow, not ageNormalised salt passage up 10–15 %, or normalised flow down 10–15 %, against commissioning data
RO membrane elements — treated effluent feed2–3 yearsFouling rate and CIP frequencyCleaning needed progressively more often, with recovery falling between cleans
DI and mixed-bed resinBy throughput, not by dateIonic load — feed conductivity multiplied by volume treatedOutlet conductivity breaking through earlier on each successive cycle
UV lamps (254 nm and 185 nm)Around 9,000 hours, roughly 12 months continuousRated lamp hoursHour meter at rated life — UV output falls well before a lamp stops lighting, so a lit lamp is not a working one
Laboratory polishing packs6–12 monthsVolume dispensed and feed qualityResistivity will no longer hold at 18.2 MΩ·cm

PP spun and melt-blown cartridges

4–12 weeks

What really decides it
Feed turbidity and iron load
Signs it is due
Differential pressure across the housing rises by roughly 1 bar, or feed pressure climbs at constant flow

Activated carbon cartridges

3–6 months

What really decides it
Chlorine load and throughput
Signs it is due
Free chlorine detected downstream — that test, not the calendar, is the decision

Pleated and membrane cartridges (0.22 / 0.45 µm)

Per batch or per validated cycle

What really decides it
Integrity test result and the validated use period
Signs it is due
A failed integrity test, or the end of the validated period, whichever comes first

Antiscalant

Continuous dosing

What really decides it
Dose rate against concentrate saturation
Signs it is due
Tank drawdown not matching the stroke setting; scale appearing on tail elements

RO membrane elements — brackish feed

3–5 years

What really decides it
Normalised salt passage and flow, not age
Signs it is due
Normalised salt passage up 10–15 %, or normalised flow down 10–15 %, against commissioning data

RO membrane elements — treated effluent feed

2–3 years

What really decides it
Fouling rate and CIP frequency
Signs it is due
Cleaning needed progressively more often, with recovery falling between cleans

DI and mixed-bed resin

By throughput, not by date

What really decides it
Ionic load — feed conductivity multiplied by volume treated
Signs it is due
Outlet conductivity breaking through earlier on each successive cycle

UV lamps (254 nm and 185 nm)

Around 9,000 hours, roughly 12 months continuous

What really decides it
Rated lamp hours
Signs it is due
Hour meter at rated life — UV output falls well before a lamp stops lighting, so a lit lamp is not a working one

Laboratory polishing packs

6–12 months

What really decides it
Volume dispensed and feed quality
Signs it is due
Resistivity will no longer hold at 18.2 MΩ·cm

Intervals are typical planning bands and vary with feed water, duty and the specific product supplied. Final intervals follow the datasheet of the item quoted.

Put consumables on a standing order

Cartridges, antiscalant, resin, UV lamps and polishing packs are predictable once the plant has run a full year. Sending the plant list and last year's consumption gets them scheduled against your maintenance calendar instead of ordered in an emergency at the point the plant is already out of specification.

Set up a consumables standing order
Commercial terms

How This Category Is Quoted

Water treatment does not have a list price, and any supplier quoting one before seeing a feed analysis is quoting a different plant from the one you need.

Pricing basis

On request, and capacity-dependent. Plant pricing moves with capacity, feed water analysis and the recovery target; membranes, cartridges and resins are quoted per element, per lot or per litre of media.

Order quantity

From a single replacement element or a case of cartridges through to full plant scope. Consumable lines are quoted per box or per lot, and the lot size is stated on the quotation.

Lead time

Confirmed per line item at quotation stage. Stocked consumable lines and made-to-order plant differ substantially, so a single blanket lead time for the category would be misleading — the quotation carries the figure for each line.

Invoicing

GST invoice against company or institutional purchase order. Proforma issued where advance payment or internal approval requires it.

Delivery coverage

Despatch from Delhi NCR across India, including plant, project and institutional sites. Delivery city and site access are asked for at enquiry because both affect despatch mode.

Documentation

Technical datasheet for the item quoted, and a test certificate where the principal supplies one with that product. Tender and institutional documentation formats are prepared on request — send the format with the enquiry so the quotation is issued in a form you can submit without rework.

Brand Sourcing Network

Trusted Global Brands. Reliable Local Support.

ScientificEdge helps laboratories structure product, grade and documentation requirements for instruments, chemicals, filtration systems and consumables before supply is confirmed.

Authentic Supply

Product identity and requested make reviewed against the exact sourcing requirement.

Documentation Support

Clear technical specs, compliance details, and buying clarity.

PAN-India Delivery

Timely fulfilment with responsive coordination across regions.

Partner Confidence

Brand-focused sourcing support

For pharma, research, diagnostics and industrial laboratories that need clear product and documentation discussions.

Featured Brand Portfolio

30 local brand logos

Whatman Filter Papers & Laboratory Filtration Products Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Ion Exchange Water Purification Systems Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Hydranautics membrane sourcing support - ScientificEdge
DuPont water treatment sourcing support - ScientificEdge
Toray membrane sourcing support - ScientificEdge
Veolia water purification sourcing support - ScientificEdge
Cytiva Life Science & Bioprocessing Solutions Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Honeywell Safety & Personal Protective Equipment Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Raychem RPG Electrical & Energy Solutions Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Borosil Laboratory Glassware & Scientific Equipment Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Pall India Filtration & Separation Technologies Supplier — ScientificEdge
Abdos Life Science Laboratory Plasticware & Consumables Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Loba Chemie AR & HPLC Grade Laboratory Chemicals Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Axiva Sichem Membrane Filters & Lab Consumables Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Qualigens Analytical Grade Laboratory Chemicals Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Hanna Instruments Water Quality Analyzers & pH Meters Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
CDH Fine Chemicals & Laboratory Reagents Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
AquaSol Water Purification Solutions & RO Systems Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
PolyLab Laboratory Plasticware & Consumables Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Merck Millipore Ultrapure Water & Filtration Systems Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
SRL Laboratory Chemicals & Certified Reagents Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Thermo Fisher Scientific Laboratory Equipment & Instruments Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
VWR laboratory sourcing support - ScientificEdge
Rankem HPLC Grade Solvents & Laboratory Chemicals Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Evoqua Industrial & Laboratory Water Purification Systems Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
HiMedia Microbiology Media & Cell Culture Products Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Merck Laboratory Chemicals & Reagents Supplier in India — ScientificEdge
Eppendorf Laboratory Instruments and Liquid Handling Products Sourcing Support — ScientificEdge
Sartorius Laboratory Balances and Life Science Products Sourcing Support — ScientificEdge
Aczet Laboratory Balances and Weighing Equipment Sourcing Support — ScientificEdge
Brand and sourcing position

How Brand Selection Works Here

ScientificEdge is a B2B supplier, wholesaler, distributor and sourcing partner. We are not a manufacturer, OEM or fabricator of water purification equipment, and we are not a testing or certification laboratory.

Where a brand or an equivalent element is specified in your BOQ, tell us at enquiry and we quote against it. Where no brand is specified, we usually offer more than one option so the technical and commercial comparison sits with you rather than being made for you.

Membranes, cartridges and resins are frequently specified as an equivalent to a named element. Send the model designation you are replacing along with the operating conditions, and the offered equivalent is matched on active area, rejection and pressure rating rather than on the part number alone.

Brand-specified BOQs quoted as specifiedEquivalents matched on specification, not part numberDatasheet supplied with the quotationTest certificate where the principal supplies oneTender documentation formats on request
Working with ScientificEdge

Why Buyers Route This Category Through One Desk

A water treatment requirement is rarely one line item. Splitting it across a plant vendor, a membrane trader and a consumables supplier is where lead times and compatibility problems come from.

One enquiry across seven groups

Plant, elements, filters, media and components quoted together, so vessel bore, element size and seal kits are matched at quotation stage rather than discovered at installation.

Selection worked from your analysis

Feed water analysis, output specification and capacity drive the recommendation. Where the analysis is incomplete, we tell you which parameter is missing rather than assuming a value.

Consumables planned, not chased

Recurring items are scheduled against your maintenance calendar once a plant has a year of running behind it.

Procurement-ready paperwork

GST invoicing, purchase order and proforma handling, and tender or institutional documentation formats prepared to the format your process requires.

Request for quotation

Technical Enquiry — Water Purification Systems

Required fields first; the technical section expands when you need it. Completing the technical fields is usually the difference between a quotation on the first pass and three emails of clarification.

Requirement
Your details
Talk to a water treatment specialist

By submitting this form you agree to be contacted by the ScientificEdge team about your water treatment requirement. Recovery, rejection, capacity and documentation availability vary by product and feed water, and are confirmed against the item quoted before order placement.

Enquiry Submitted

Thank you!

Your enquiry has been submitted successfully. Our B2B sales team will review your requirement and get back to you within 24 hours.

We typically respond within 2–4 business hours during weekdays.

Frequently asked

Water Purification Systems — Common Questions

What is the difference between RO, NF, UF and MF?

They separate at different scales. MF removes particles from 0.1 to 10 µm, UF removes colloids and bacteria from 0.01 to 0.1 µm, NF rejects divalent ions at roughly 200 to 1,000 Da, and RO rejects monovalent and divalent salts at 96 to 99.8 %.

Only NF and RO reduce dissolved salts. UF and MF are pre-treatment and clarification — they will not lower TDS.

Why is my RO permeate TDS rising?

The three common causes are membrane fouling or scaling, a failed brine seal or O-ring allowing feed to bypass the element, and a genuine rise in feed TDS.

Separate them by normalising permeate flow and salt passage against commissioning data, checking current feed TDS, and probing individual vessels. Rising salt passage with steady flow points at a seal or element failure; falling flow points at fouling or scaling.

What causes RO membrane fouling, and how do I tell fouling from scaling?

Fouling comes from biological growth, colloids and organics arriving from the feed; scaling comes from sparingly soluble salts concentrating in the reject — calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate and silica.

The pattern differs. Fouling typically shows first as rising differential pressure across the lead elements. Scaling typically shows as falling permeate flow with rising salt passage on the tail elements. Where each appears in the array is the most reliable clue.

How do I choose between a 4040 and an 8040 RO membrane?

By plant flow. An 8040 element carries roughly four times the active area of a 4040 of the same length, so 8040 suits higher-flow plants with fewer vessels, while 4040 suits smaller skids, tighter plant rooms and staged expansion.

Whichever you choose, vessel bore, adapters and brine seals must match the element size exactly. Mixing sizes within an array is not a substitution you can make on site.

What feed TDS can a brackish water RO membrane handle?

Brackish-water elements are normally applied up to around 10,000 ppm feed TDS, at 55 to 75 % recovery depending on hardness and silica. Between 10,000 and 25,000 ppm the design moves to high-pressure brackish or seawater elements; above 25,000 ppm it is seawater RO at 55 to 70 bar.

Recovery is limited by scaling, not by TDS alone. Silica and hardness frequently cap recovery well before the salinity does.

What is the difference between a DM plant and an EDI system?

A DM plant uses ion exchange resin regenerated with acid and caustic on a batch cycle. EDI regenerates continuously using an electric field, so it produces high-purity water without regeneration chemicals or a regeneration outage.

EDI is less tolerant of its feed. Hardness, chlorine and organics must be removed upstream, which in practice means EDI is fed by RO permeate rather than raw water.

What is the difference between ASTM Type I, II and III water?

Type I is the highest purity — 18 MΩ·cm minimum resistivity, 1 µg/L sodium and chloride — for HPLC, LC-MS, PCR and trace analysis. Type II at 1.0 MΩ·cm suits general analytical work. Type III at 4.0 MΩ·cm suits glasswash, autoclave feed and reagent make-up.

Note that Type III has a tighter conductivity limit than Type II. The types are not one descending scale, so name the parameters that matter, not just the type.

Which system suits high TDS borewell water?

Borewell feed between 2,000 and 10,000 ppm TDS usually needs pre-treatment followed by brackish-water RO, often in two stages, at 55 to 70 % recovery.

The pre-treatment is decided by what else is in the water. Iron, hardness, silica and turbidity each call for a different upstream stage, and getting that wrong is what blocks cartridge filters within days and fouls elements within months.

How often should RO membranes be replaced?

Typically 3 to 5 years on brackish feed and 2 to 3 years on treated effluent, but age is the weakest indicator. Replace on trend: normalised salt passage up 10 to 15 %, or normalised permeate flow down 10 to 15 % against commissioning data, and not recovering after a clean.

This is why commissioning data matters. Without it there is no baseline to normalise against and replacement becomes guesswork.

How often should cartridge filters and UV lamps be replaced?

PP spun and melt-blown cartridges typically run 4 to 12 weeks, activated carbon 3 to 6 months, and UV lamps around 9,000 hours or roughly 12 months of continuous operation.

Use the duty signal rather than the date. Change cartridges when differential pressure across the housing rises by about 1 bar, change carbon when free chlorine is detected downstream, and change UV lamps at rated hours — output falls long before a lamp stops lighting.

What details are needed for an accurate water purification system quotation?

Five things decide the design: end use, feed water source, feed TDS in ppm or conductivity in µS/cm, required output quality, and required capacity in LPH or m³/h.

A feed water analysis is worth more than all five described in prose. If you have a lab report, send it — it removes the largest single source of quotation error in this category.

Do you supply water purification systems and consumables across India, including for tenders?

Yes. Despatch is from Delhi NCR across India, covering plant, project, institutional and laboratory sites, and we support bulk orders, tenders and rate contracts.

For tender work, send the documentation format your procurement process requires along with the technical scope. Lead time is confirmed per line item on the quotation, because stocked consumables and made-to-order plant differ substantially.